JUDICIAL FRAUD: Magistrate Jails Farmers, Grabs A Third of Their Farm
EXPOSED: Magistrate presided over farm case in which he is a direct beneficiary
A Zimbabwean magistrate, Samuel Zuze, has been exposed in what counts as one of Zimbabwe’s most blatant cases of judicial malpractice and fraud after he presided over a farm dispute in which he is a direct beneficiary, with an offer letter entitling him to one third of the disputed farm.
“Well the big news is that the magistrate trying our case has an offer letter for the third portion of our farm, which we had been struggling to figure out who had it!”, one of the farmers told Investigative Africa, “Now how does that sound, no wonder he was not allowing any appeals etc he had the most to lose! I will leave it at that and let your shock and horror sink in!”
Zuze, who has in the past weeks become a central figure in the matter between the state and farmers resisting eviction without compensation in Chipinge, failed to recuse himself from hearing the case of the farmers after receiving an offer letter to a portion of the farm dated November 13, 2009.
The farmers, Algernon Taffs, Mr Z.F Joubert, Mike Odendaal and Mike Jahme, have packed most of their belongings and are waiting to hear from Zimbabwe’s High Court, which granted them reprieve last week despite Magistrate Zuze’s insistence that they should leave.
very intresting write up now to further my research
like your site will visit again
To whom it may concern 11-18-10
From buddy lee George
12016 gladhill ave
La mirada ca 90638-1505
Trial ended 8-15-09 the verdict
Enclosed in this letter is information
Regarding a wrongful conviction on
Case# VA107160
The trial was held at Norwalk superior
Court located in Norwalk California
The Honorable judge Roger Ito division S
Listed below is reasons why and enclosed in this writing is evidence Were all the evidence in my case had been destroyed 3 to 5 months before the trial it’s a email from the detective to the district attorney in my case disclosing the date evidence was destroyed 3 to 5 months before the trial
1.) my due process rights were violated
2.) I supoened 5 officers only one showed up and that was detective hakala out of Whittier police department he was the lead detective and the expert witness
3.)their was bias involved with the processing of evidence because he used his own lab were the evidence had also been destroyed 3 to 5 months before the trial.
4.) the detective stated during the trial
He removed the drugs before the pre search video because he had a dog their was no dog
5.) right before the trial there was a conflict of interest with the attorneys that were representing me they violated attorney client privilege by having a meeting with the city of la mirada with out my permission nor knowledge were my case was discussed
6.) the attorneys name was Henry salcido out of long beach
7.) Henry salcido had two retired district attorneys working for him that were overfimilararity with detectives involved in my case
8.) these attorneys told me they don’t care if I’m innocent or guilty and that I should take a deal under the condition
I move out of la mirada when I get out
9.) Henry salcido told me if I gave home 180.000 and sign over the deed to our home he said he is best friends with steve cooley he could also make this case disappear
10.) when the trial started the attorney I hired Joanne alberry out of riverside dident have enough time to familiarize her self with the case
11.) district attorney kang the Los Angeles county district attorney had me charged with prison priors and strikes I dident have and it was not until after the verdict did she admit her mistakes email below is evidence of
Were the evidence was destroyed
12.) I was charged with possession for sales when no drugs were found in my possession and no money was recovered
13.) cruel and unusual punishment
14.) violation of my due process rights
15.) negligence
16.) malpractice
17.) wrongful conviction
18.) misrepresentation
Please consider looking into this thanks
Respectfully submitted
Buddy George
19.) the first search warrant was denied whittier narcotics came in any way
20.) the 2nd search warrant was done with the name of Walter Eugene Farris
A guy who has never stepped foot in our home
Buddy George – VA107160From: joanne alberry
View Contact To: LAURIE YTARTE —————–
————————————————————-
– Laurie,here is the email from the Detective
telling the court that all the property was
destroyed. Sorry about all of it. Feel free to mail
me any payments you can at my office address
4229 Main St Suite 4 Riverside CA 92501 I will
let you know when I find an attorney who will
take on a governemtn entity. good luck to you
and Buddy,Joanne ———- Forwarded message
———-From: Date: Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:23
AMSubject: Fw: Buddy George – VA107160To:
joannealberry@gmail.com Hi Joanne, Per our
conversation, here is the email from Detective
Hakala confirming that the evidence was
destroyed. I will request that our matter be taken
off calendar today. Thanks. ———————-
Forwarded by Miriam Kang/DAUsers/NLADA on
09/25/2009 07:22 AM ————————— To:
cc: Subject: RE: Buddy George – VA107160 I
contacted our central property and the items
seized in the Buddy George case (408-15814-
0460-184) were dispoed on 05-29-09. Any other
questions just let me know. Eric ———————
———————————————————–
From: MKang@da.lacounty.gov
[mailto:MKang@da.lacounty.gov]Sent: Thu
9/24/2009 2:49 PMTo: Hakala, Eric J.Subject:
Buddy George – VA107160 Hi Detective Hakala,
Just as a reminder, please email me a letter
confirming that the the property booked into
evidence for this case has been disposed of and
the date of disposal. Thanks so much!
Sincerely,Miriam KangDeputy District
AttorneyTel: 562-807-7211